GATEKEEPER’S HOUSE IN GRONINGEN – EDZARD KONING (1869-1954)

mrt. 11, 2024

The former Gatekeeper’s House (Poortershuisje), built in 1621 with its charming, crooked step-gable, was located at the end of the Binnen-Damsterdiep canal and was one of the most beloved parts of Groningen. Unfortunately, this beautiful location no longer exists.

Images: Beeldbank Groningen, The Groninger Archieven

For almost 250 years, the house provided shelter for the gatekeeper of the Steentilpoort. This gatekeeper was also responsible for collecting tolls and closing the Damsterdiep, hence he was known as the dam closer of the Damsterdiep. One such gatekeeper, Eppo van Vreden, is notably mentioned in the history books of Groningen. In 1672, he was arrested on suspicion of bribery. During the wartime, the Bishop of Munster requested him not to close the Damsterdiep at night with a chain and floating log. A letter found with the gatekeeper confirmed the bribery, and he was executed on the scaffold two days later.


In 1856, the house lost its function when the levying of import and export duties was finally abolished. Two years later, the city sold the citizen's house to Mr. H. de Witt. Sixty years after that, in 1915, the city reacquired the house for 2950 guilders through a public auction. There were soon reports in the press that the . city had repurchased the house to demolish it due to other plans for this part of the city.


However, plans for demolition only became concrete in 1926. The Gatekeeper’s House was reportedly in a state of disrepair and at risk of collapse. The restoration, estimated for at least 16,000 guilders, would amount to almost an entire reconstruction of the house. Simultaneously, plans were made to fill in the Damsterdiep to improve traffic conditions. It was argued that the experience of the house would be lost after the filling of the Damsterdiep, suggesting it would be better to demolish it rather than undergo an expensive restoration. The majority of the council was in favor of demolishing the house."


After strong protests from local residents and the Dutch heritage society ‘Bond Heemschut’, followed by objections from the Dutch Cultural Heritage Agency, more and more city council members turned against the demolition plans. On February 14, 1927, it was decided by a vote of 17 against 15 to abandon the demolition. The house was to be restored as a historical memory and an element of urban beauty.

The oil painting and the watercolour of the Gatekeeper’s House were likely painted by Edzard Koning between 1890 and 1895. During this time, he often visited Winschoten to care for his sick father and would also frequently visit Groningen. Both artworks were created before 1926 because in that year, the prominent linden tree featured in both works died due to poisoning. This magnificent tree was an integral part of the Gatekeeper’s House, almost inseparable from it. In joy of the preservation of the house, Mrs. Kraus-Groeneveld from "Vosbergen" (Eelde) offered the city of Groningen a new tree at the beginning of 1927. "May this tree, like the house, outlive all living residents of Groningen and, if possible, many generations to come." Not much later, the old, by then completely decayed tree, was set on fire by two mischievous boys. In 1928, the new linden tree, already measuring 95 cm in girth, was planted.

The Gatekeeper's House was seen as a link in the great chain that connects the past with the present and the future. Moreover, it quickly became apparent that despite modern traffic and increased parking pressure, demolition of the house was not necessary.


Six years later, in 1933, plans resurfaced for the infilling of the BinnenDamsterdiep and the demolition of the Gatekeeper’s House. This time, among other reasons, due to the increased number of courier services in the city and the lack of parking spaces for the courier wagons. When the city council this time agreed to the demolition, Bond Heemschut once again objected. Furthermore, 50 professors and lecturers from the University of Groningen petitioned the Queen, urging the annulment of the council's decision to fill in the Binnen-Damsterdiep and demolish the Gatekeeper's House. Consequently, the Minister decided to temporarily suspend the council's decision. On February 13, 1934, the decision was overturned by the Crown.

The infilling of the Binnen-Damsterdiep and the demolition of the Gatekeeper's House were refused, as it involved a monument of high value and this important part of the military and economic history of the city of Groningen and the development of the city's layout should not be lost. The Damsterdiep canal and the house are important elements of a charming cityscape with its own atmosphere, which would be compromised and historical and aesthetic values destroyed. The house derives special value from its picturesque appearance, further enhanced by its location on the water of the Binnen-Damsterdiep. The parking issue was to be solved in another way.


And then, the Gatekeeper's House was lost after all. On April 15, 1945, during the liberation of Groningen, the house was shot into flames. The roof was gone, and the interior was completely burned out. The Dutch Cultural Heritage Agency gave permission on December 11, 1946, to demolish the now ruinous building, on the condition that a similar building would be rebuilt in its place and that all usable materials recovered during the demolition would be reused. In the summer of 1948, the house was eventually demolished, and with it, the last remnant of the 17th-century fortifications in the city of Groningen disappeared. In 1953, the Binnen-Damsterdiep was filled in. The house was not rebuilt. Fortunately, Edzard Koning captured the now-lost atmosphere and historical memory in his oil painting and watercolour of the Gatekeepers's House (Poortershuisje) with the linden tree, located at the Binnen-Damsterdiep.



www.adelweinkunst.nl                                                                                                                                                          9-3-2024

08 mrt., 2024
Bernard Schregel, born on May 17, 1870, in The Hague and passing away on October 18, 1956, was a versatile Dutch artist. He received his education at the prestigious Academy of Fine Arts in The Hague, where he was taught by prominent figures such as Frits Jansen and the Hague impressionist Jan Vrolijk.
04 mrt., 2024
Bernard Schregel, geboren op 17 mei 1870 in Den Haag en overleden op 18 oktober 1956, was een veelzijdige Nederlandse kunstenaar. Hij genoot zijn opleiding aan de prestigieuze Akademie van Beeldende Kunsten in Den Haag, waar hij onder meer onderwezen werd door Frits Jansen en de Haagse impressionist Jan Vrolijk.
16 feb., 2024
Born on January 17, 1894, in The Hague, Ina Hooft lived through an era of art that spanned the first half of the twentieth century, a period rich in artistic upheavals and innovations. Having passed away in 1994 in the Rosa Spier House in Laren, Hooft dedicated her life to art, despite personal setbacks such as the early loss of her parents and severe injuries to her legs due to a faulty medical treatment.
16 feb., 2024
Geboren op 17 januari 1894 in Den Haag, doorleefde Ina Hooft een tijdperk van kunst die zich uitstrekte over de eerste helft van de twintigste eeuw, een periode rijk aan artistieke omwentelingen en vernieuwingen. Overleden in 1994 in het Rosa Spierhuis in Laren, heeft Hooft haar leven gewijd aan de kunst, ondanks persoonlijke tegenslagen zoals het vroege verlies van haar ouders en ernstige verwondingen aan haar benen door een foutieve medische behandeling.
16 feb., 2024
Herman Bogman (1890-1975), an artist whose unmistakable talent and self-critical approach promised that he would become a painter who attracts attention, is inextricably linked with the Hague Watercolourists.
15 feb., 2024
Herman Bogman (1890-1975), een kunstenaar wiens onmiskenbare talent en zelfkritische benadering beloofden dat hij een schilder zou worden die de aandacht op zich zou vestigen, is onlosmakelijk verbonden met de Haagse Aquarellisten. Zijn artistieke reis, die begon met olieverfschilderijen en zich ontvouwde in de verfijnde kunst van het aquarelleren, toont een voortdurende zoektocht naar expressie en vernieuwing. Bogman's werk, rijk aan detail en emotie, belichaamt een diepe waardering voor de subtiele kracht van kleur en licht.  In de jaren dertig begon Bogman zijn talent te verkennen door middel van olieverfschilderijen, waarbij hij zich voornamelijk richtte op het vastleggen van stadsgezichten, boerenerven en stillevens.
08 dec., 2022
Sjollema: "Wij hebben geen bindend of verbindend credo, het is moeilijk om in woorden vast te leggen welke picturale waarde voor ons het zwaarste weegt, welke richting ons leidt. Ook water laat zich niet vastleggen, tenzij het bevriest. Wij beminnen wat vliedt. Zoals vissen in het water kunt u ons her en der zien bewegen, groot en klein, van velerlei kleur en gedaante". Sjollema: "We have no binding or binding credo, it is difficult to record in words which pictorial value weighs heaviest for us, which direction leads us. Water can also not be fixed, unless it freezes. We love what flows. Like fish in the water, you can see us moving here and there, large and small, of all colors and shapes." Joop Sjollema (Groningen 1900 - Amsterdam 1990) vissen – fish
09 nov., 2022
On the right bank of the IJssel River, just before Zutphen, lies the ruins of Nijenbeek Castle. The tower is a remnant of a much larger complex that suffered much from demolition in the 16th century, to build fortifications against the city of Deventer, and from war
Kasteel Nijenbeek
09 nov., 2022
Aan de rechter oever van de IJssel, even voor Zutphen, ligt de ruïne van Kasteel Nijenbeek. De toren is een restant van een veel groter complex dat veel te lijden heeft gehad van sloop in de 16e eeuw, om versterkingen op te bouwen tegen de stad Deventer, en door oorlogsgeweld.
22 aug., 2022
Inkttekening door J.H. Sikemeier
Meer posts
Share by: